Tessa Fry on LinkedIn: Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' (2024)

Tessa Fry

Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

  • Report this post

Tax on remote working?After 8 months, the initial enthusiasm for remote working seems to have gone quiet and now the focus is on hybrid working ie a mixture of home and office instead.Taxing remote workers at 5 % to support lower paid workers who are unable to work from home is a novel idea but one which is likely to meet with opposition if employees are liable for the tax for choosing to work remotely particularly as UK employees have the right to request flexible workingHowever, employees are unlikely to object if it’s employers who are liable for the tax for requiring staff to work from home to save on office costs.

Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' theguardian.com

17

2 Comments

Like Comment

Zoe Lawson LLB (hons), Chartered Company Secretary

3y

  • Report this comment

One way or another - the salary is clawed at.....

Like Reply

1Reaction

Bruce A.

Strategic Marketing Director & Consultant.

3y

  • Report this comment

Oh dear. I'm betting even the Germans can't get this idea off the ground. Tax returns including daily diary anyone ?

Like Reply

1Reaction 2Reactions

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

More Relevant Posts

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    New rights aimed at helping working families will apply from 6 April 2024. These include new rights for carers; improved paternity leave; changes to flexible working regulations; and extension of redundancy during pregnancy and return from maternity leave. Details are set out in the attached article.https://lnkd.in/e9g5yMSS

    8

    1 Comment

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    Reintroduction of fees in Employment TribunalsThe Government is proposing to reintroduce fees for issuing claims in the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal.There will, however, be a consultation before any decision is made.If fees are implemented, these will become payable for all claims issued on or after 1 November 2024.The proposed fee is £55 per case or appeal payable by the Claimant.By court standards, this is a modest fee.The Government’s previous attempt to introduce fees was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2017 ruling they were unlawful in the case of R (on the application of Unison) -v- Lord Chancellor.The level of fees which applied from 2013 was so excessive resulting in a substantial drop in Tribunal claims which, the SC ruled, ‘effectively prevents access to justice and is therefore unlawful’. Following the SC decision, fees were abolished and refunds were paid to all claimants who had paid the fees from 2013 to 2017.However, the SC decision did not rule out fees completely provided they were set at a reasonable level.The Government’s current aim of reintroducing fees in 2024 is for users to contribute to costs in the tribunals, incentivise parties to settle their disputes early and to alleviate some of the pressures the tribunals are currently facing.As the new proposed fee of £55 is low by court standards and there will be an exemption scheme for those unable to afford it, they are unlikely to be subject to any successful legal challenge. CommentGiven the modest level and exemption scheme, the fees are likely to be introduced in November. They may make some impact on spurious claims but it is unlikely to make a significant difference.Once introduced the fees will doubtless increase over time.

    16

    1 Comment

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    Supreme Court delivers final blow for Deliveroo ridersContrary to other appeal judgments upholding worker status, the Supreme Court has recently determined that Deliveroo riders are self-employed and not workers.The final appeal brought by the IWGB union against the Central Arbitration Committee’s decision rejecting union recognition was therefore unsuccessful.Had the appeal succeeded, then the IWGB union would have been entitled to conduct collective bargaining with Deliveroo on pay, hours and holidays on behalf of the Deliveroo riders in the relevant bargaining unit.The SC decision was based on Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights which protects the right to freedom of association and to join a trade union.However, it only applies if there is an employment relationship (whether with workers or employees) and not if the individuals are self-employed. In determining self-employed status, the key factor for the Supreme Court was that the contract between Deliveroo and the riders provided for a genuine right of substitution (even if it was rarely used in practice).This right was totally inconsistent with there being an employment relationship.The riders were also free to work as and when they wanted and could even work for Deliveroo’s competitors.There was no obligation to accept work or carry out a minimum number of orders and they provided their own equipment.All these factors amounted to genuine self-employment rather than an employment relationship.Even if there had been an employment relationship, the Supreme Court also determined that Article 11 did not include a right to compulsory collective bargaining.Despite this decision, other successful cases against gig economy companies upholding worker status have led to improved terms and conditions for the delivery riders/drivers.Some of these companies now provide insurance and sickness cover and one has even recognised a union including for collective bargaining purposes.Some are also offering worker status contracts in exchange for guaranteed hours and control over the routes together with holiday pay.This does, however, mean that the riders would be taxed on an employed rather than self-employed basis.The government had an opportunity to address worker status following the Taylor Report in 2017 which recommended a new ‘dependent contractor’ status for workers who would be entitled to statutory holiday and sick pay.However, despite carrying out full consultation, the government has failed to make any significant changes.Nor has it addressed the discrepancy between employment and tax law as the latter does not recognise worker status.

    Blow to gig economy workers after UK supreme court rules against collective bargaining rights theguardian.com

    23

    8 Comments

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    Radio InterviewIt was a pleasure to be interviewed again by Patricia Vincent (NN D) on Resonance FM - The Workplace discussing my latest employment law updates on flexible working, menopause in the workplace and other changes. To listen see link below:https://lnkd.in/ejh6S-5K

    • Tessa Fry on LinkedIn: Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' (17)

    30

    5 Comments

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    Employment Law UpdateSee my latest employment law updates https://lnkd.in/eeNd9aQgPart 1 covers changes to flexible working regulations, menopause in the workplace, new rights for parents and carers and tips and service charges.Part 2 covers changes to statutory payments and discrimination awards.

    13

    1 Comment

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    13

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    I was delighted to give a talk on Menopause in the Workplace to Health Managementwhich was attended by over 60 doctors and medical professionals.For more information please feel free to contact me at tessa@solts.co.uk #menopause #employmentlaw #workplaceissues

    • Tessa Fry on LinkedIn: Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' (28)

    20

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry reposted this

    • Report this post

    8

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    It was a pleasure to speak to Paul Sonn, Irene Tung and Amy Pinilla about unfair dismissal law in the UK and the National Employment Law Project to implement 'unfair discharge' legislation in the US (www.nelp.org). Look forward to seeing how this progresses.

    NELP Leads the Good-Jobs Movement nelp.org

    28

    1 Comment

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Tessa Fry

    Employment Partner at Solomon Taylor & Shaw

    • Report this post

    Radio InterviewIt was a pleasure to be interviewed again by Patricia Vincent on Resonance FM, the Workplace discussing my latest employment law update on return to work issues and other changes.See link below.https://lnkd.in/e9bzJv2Z

    • Tessa Fry on LinkedIn: Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' (38)

    49

    1 Comment

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

Tessa Fry on LinkedIn: Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' (41)

Tessa Fry on LinkedIn: Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' (42)

727 followers

  • 137 Posts
  • 16 Articles

View Profile

Follow

More from this author

  • Return to Work Issues Tessa Fry 3y
  • Radio Interview Tessa Fry 3y
  • Radio interview on furlough scheme Tessa Fry 4y

Explore topics

  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Business Administration
  • HR Management
  • Content Management
  • Engineering
  • Soft Skills
  • See All
Tessa Fry on LinkedIn: Staff who work from home after pandemic 'should pay more tax' (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jerrold Considine

Last Updated:

Views: 6294

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jerrold Considine

Birthday: 1993-11-03

Address: Suite 447 3463 Marybelle Circles, New Marlin, AL 20765

Phone: +5816749283868

Job: Sales Executive

Hobby: Air sports, Sand art, Electronics, LARPing, Baseball, Book restoration, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Jerrold Considine, I am a combative, cheerful, encouraging, happy, enthusiastic, funny, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.